Saturday, August 01, 2020

The Mighty Khan

Khan Academy is the apotheosis of K-12 distance learning and one of the chief miracles of the information age.

Nowhere can one find a larger variety of excellent educational offerings, from Pre-K curricula and grade school standards to AP Art History, APUSH, Differential Equations, and Organic Chemistry.

Khan's educational offerings, available in 42 languages, are used in diverse ways in public, private, and homeschool classrooms all over the world. Total views are in the billions, and growing.

And no wonder. The courses are rigorous, well-organized, and expertly taught, and a pleasure to use. Founder Sal Kahn is a genius, a visionary, and probably the world’s best private tutor.

There’s no excuse for boredom.

Click here.

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, July 01, 2020

The Centimeter Grid

Use of a "Centimeter Grid" is a wonderful, multi-sensory way to teach basic math facts: addition, subtraction, multiplication, division.

Using the grid, students color-in squares to represent numbers, and then count the end result.

For instance, to learn 2 + 6: 

The student first colors two squares the same color, labeling them with a "2," and then six more in the same line using a different color, labeling these with a six, and finally, after counting up all the colored squares, labeling the entire set of colored squares with an "8." By this demonstration, it's clear that 2 + 6 = 8. [It's also clear that 6 + 2 = 8, 8 – 6 =2, and 8 – 2 = 6, thus completing a "fact family" cementing the  addition/subtraction relationship of the numbers 2, 6, and 8].

After discovery of each math fact, students "collect" the facts by writing each one on a flash card for later games of "flip the card" to help with memorization (Triangle Cards can speed up the process considerably by emphasizing fact family relationships).

But memorization should only be attempted after discovery. Students must first discover the math fact experientially, preferably physically, in multiple ways, by repeatedly demonstrating the fact for themselves. Then they record the fact for purposes of memorization. 

The order here is critical: discovery first, then recording, and finally memorization.

Consistent with the Scientific Method, it's best if students use more than one method, and repeat the experiment several times, to confirm results before recording them (e.g. first using a Centimeter Grid, then a Hundred Numbers Chart, and then counting pennies). This helps ensure the development of "number sense," a core mathematical capacity without which memorization is an empty exercise, at best. Memorization of math facts without corroborating discovery robs students of the intuitive "feel" for numbers they'll need to be successful in advanced courses later on.

Only if the student knows, experientially, by his own experimentation and record keeping, that 2 + 6 does in fact make 8, will he be able to make "sense" of that fact and integrate it with other ideas. This is a crucial distinction: the difference between mere belief and actual experience; between mastery and connectable knowledge on the one hand, and isolated, disassociated, meaningless memorization on the other.

Download your own copy of a Centimeter Grid here.

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Monday, June 01, 2020

Math and the Master

The phrase "Renaissance Man" is epitomoized by Leonardo da Vinci, the master of masters, founder of the High Renaissance. Geometry infused Leonardo's work, and was a particular obsession of his (e.g. The Golden Ratio, perspective, knots, fractals).

An article published by The Mona Lisa Foundation goes into some detail about the geometric underpinnings of Leonardo's design thinking.

It begins:

The important relationship of mathematics to art cannot be [overstated] when discussing Leonardo’s later work, and in numerous documents, letters and notes, the relevance of this is well documented. At times, he seems obsessed with these issues: while working on Mona Lisa for example, Leonardo is reported by Fra’ da Novellara to be concentrating intensely on geometry.

“Non mi legga chi non e matematico.”

“Let no one read me who is not a mathematician.”

-- Leonardo da Vinci

[Continue reading here.]

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Friday, May 01, 2020

Episodic Memory vs. Semantic Memory

Memory is mysterious.

Why do we recall some facts and not others? These event but not those?

How does human memory work?

What can we do to optimize memory in various situations and settings?

30-year primary teacher Clare Sealy has written a fascinating acting article in Education Next contrasting Episodic Memory with Semantic Memory and discussing the implications in educational settings.

The article begins:

When we look back on our own school days, our strongest memories are probably a mix of big occasions—field trips, plays, and sports days alongside more personal events tinged with strong emotion. Things that happened that were really funny or sad, or that made us feel excited, interested, exhilarated, or angry. We don’t tend to remember vividly, if at all, actually learning the substance of math or English or design technology. We might remember amusing anecdotes from lessons gone awry, or still bristle at past injustices — “but I wasn’t talking” — or have a vague impression of sitting in the science lab, with fleeting snippets of memories of this or that experiment. All of which leads to us making the entirely reasonable hypothesis that if we want students to remember what we teach them, then we need to make our lessons more like the spectacular one-off special events, or, at the very least, involve something specially selected because it’s exciting and possibly unusual. Memorable events, in this view, should form the template for creating memorable lessons.

As reasonable as this seems, this is a myth. It is a myth because human memory works in two different ways, both equally valid but one of which is much better at enabling us to transfer what we have learnt to new contexts. This transfer is an essential prerequisite for creativity and critical thinking.

The two forms of memory are known as episodic and semantic memory. Episodic memory is the memory of the ‘episodes’ of our life—our autobiographical memory. This takes no effort on our part, it simply happens. We don’t have to try consciously to remember what happened yesterday. Those memories just happen automatically. But there is a downside. Episodic memory is “easy come, easy go.” If you try to remember what you had for lunch yesterday, you will probably remember. If you try to remember what you had for lunch a year ago today—unless that happened to be some very significant date and some particularly noteworthy lunch—you will have no idea.

Semantic memory, on the other hand, involves much harder work. We have to expend effort to create semantic memories. This is the kind of memory we use when we consciously study something because we want to remember it. Unlike episodic memory, it does not just happen. The upside, however, is that the effort involved results in a long lasting memory.

Have you ever been in a course where you have really enjoyed listening to the speaker, found the subject matter interesting and the presenter amusing and engaging. Yet when you try to explain to someone the next day what the course was about, all that is really left is a vague impression of your emotions during the day, tinged with the odd snippet of content? You know the course was really good yet can’t really explain what it was actually about beyond the most general of assertions.

[Continue reading here.]

Wednesday, April 01, 2020

Surest Way to Destroy Your Score

It never ceases to amaze me that students will spend time and effort prepping for a test like the ACT or SAT and then go out and stay out late with friends the night before the big test. 

Please … promise me you won’t do that.

The best way to ruin your SAT/ACT score – by far – is to not have enough sleep the night before you take the test.

In fact, one good night’s sleep isn’t really enough. You should get plenty of sleep on each of the two nights immediately before test day. Three nights would be best.

Plan your week so that you’ll be able to go to bed early and get plenty of sleep the last two or three nights before taking your test. Get ahead on any papers or presentations due and study in advance for upcoming tests or other assessments.

You’ve put in a lot of hard work in preparation for this. Whatever you do, get good sleep, and be well-rested when you take the exam.

P.S. The next best way to destroy your score is to be dehydrated. Make sure to drink a lot of water each of the last two days before test day, and a full glass that morning. Don't forget to use the bathroom before leaving for the test site.

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.