Tuesday, November 01, 2011

"Honor Society" Rip-off Alert

You know those slick "honor society" membership enticements you get in the mail once your high achieving teenager gets about halfway through his or her sophomore year? Tempting you to provide your child membership in a "selective and prestigious" national honor roll that may boost chances of admission to top colleges just by joining? You know ... offers that seem perhaps too good to refuse?

Refuse them.

Writing in the Education section of the New York Times, high school guidance director Robert Bardwell exposes the fraudulent nature of these seemingly legitmate offers:

I NEVER recommend that a student pay to join any organization that will supposedly have an impact in the admission process. Even free honor societies available to high school students (i.e.: National Honor Society, Pro Merito and individual subject area societies) have little or no effect, especially at highly visible institutions. 

If a student wants to join such an organization for the other benefits of membership, that is fine, but not to help get a leg up on his admission chances.

If there is a hint that admission chances would be improved as a result of his being a member, I would suggest you report it to the Better Business Bureau as it may constitute fraud.

You can read Bardwell's entire post here.

As usual, too good to be true is neither true nor good. It's amazing how deeply infected with manipulative, deceptive commercial spin American culture has become in recent decades. What appear to be beneficient invitations may in reality be academic industry shakedowns, and any unfamiliar but official-sounding scholastic organizations that solicit enrollment by mail should be regarded with strong suspicion and thoroughly investigated before raising your hopes or sending any money.

Bardwell is also the president of the New England Association for College Admission Counseling, and provides Times readers with additional advice about the daunting college admissions and financial aid processes here.

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Cite It Right

Properly formatting the information one presents in an academic work is important. Doing so is probably required, and in any case, it's easy ... with a little help!

To the unprepared, however, conforming to particular writing and formatting styles in high school and college research papers can be a real hassle, and many students find this requirement irritating, time consuming, and distracting. APA, MLA, and Chicago styles all have different requirements for presenting and citing information. Strict and correct adherence to the style favored by the instructor is absolutely necessary, and even minor deviations may result in a lowered grade for the project you're working on.

Dealing properly with headings, tables of content, page numbering, bibliographies, footnotes, etc. can be troublesome. But full compliance with standards of correct formatting is non-negotiable to many teachers, and patient submission to rigorous formatting requirements gives your work a professional look and feel that noticeably and significantly improves its value.

Luckily, software that interfaces with popular word processors to easily produce correctly formatted written projects with a minimum of fuss and bother is available for both Mac and PC platforms!

---

Reference Point Software Templates cost only $28, work with both Mac and PC operating systems, and allow the user to compose properly formatted works in APA or MLA style using Microsoft Word, Microsoft Works, or Corel WordPerfect (although I don't have personal experience with this product, numerous customer testimonials tout it's effectiveness and ease of use.

---

Various online sites exist to help students with proper formatting and citation. The following are two you might like to visit:

---

Dr. Scribe's Guide to Research Style:

http://www.docstyles.com/;

and an excellent writing help site produced by Purdue University:

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/.

---

Various, now you have no excuse.

Cite it right!

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Thursday, September 01, 2011

Fear And Loathing In Academia

It seems that
neocon strategists have been hard at work on a new project: to use the left-leaning political biases of most university faculty members as evidence that liberal indoctrination of students is occurring at these institutions.

As it turns out, graduating from college actually correlates with conservative, not liberal, political affiliation. The entire notion that left-leaning professors need to be replaced by right-leaning ones is a solution in search of a problem – another deliberate, politically motivated deception by those on the far right.

A recent editorial in the (conservative) Wall Street Journal brings the issue into the open:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110009058.

Apparently, there is something dangerous afoot – but not from an imagined specter of liberal professorial brainwashing. Imagine this: conservative ideologues are now actually creating traction with an idea to ban instructional content that any student claims to be "offensive."

That's right! In order to eliminate a non-existent threat of liberal ideological indoctrination at the nation's colleges and universities, far-right activists want to allow anyone offended by any information presented in any class to have that information stripped from course syllabi. Not taught. Not discussed. Just gone. In true Orwellian tradition, the plan is called the "Academic Bill of Rights (ABOR)."

Let's see ... you find murder offensive, so we can't teach Shakespeare's Hamlet. I'm offended by the notion of public entitlement programs, so we can't talk about Roosevelt's New Deal or compare capitalism to socialism. Someone else takes offense at the notion of evolution, so half the biology courses have to be rewritten to exclude any mention of it. A depressed student is offended by the color blue, so we strip it (along with purple and green) from the color wheel.

Aside from the surreal kookiness and unworkability of such an idea, and the obvious totalitarian implications, what amazes me the most is that this plan is actually gaining support at prestigious institutions such as Princeton and Temple University, which have already adopted versions of the ABOR.

Have we all lost our collective marbles?

Is it just me ... or is this one of the worst ideas ever concocted?

Like many things born on the political fringes, this whole thing would be laughable if it wasn't so scary.

Click here to read an excellent Washington Post article that provides all the details.

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Monday, August 01, 2011

SAT Prep Planning (Part 2)

A host of nation-wide testing companies (Princeton Review,
Kaplan, Ivy West, Revolution Prep, etc.) offer pre-packaged test prep courses. These courses are sometimes quite good – but inevitably they're pricey and usually require a huge commitment of time and energy. School-sponsored courses offered by local firms or coaches are often less expensive and time consuming, but can also be much less effective than those administered by established companies. 

[Buyer beware: prep course "guarantees" are not normally straight money-back guarantees, but instead merely allow dissatisfied students to retake the course one more time for free or at a reduced rate.]

For students who wish to prepare on their own, there are a plethora of ACT/SAT study guides and workbooks available commercially. While not as effective as working with a good private coach or investing considerable time and money in a top-flight SAT course, disciplined study with a good work book along with plenty of practice before test day can make a big difference, and is certainly much better than no test prep at all! 

Unfortunately, most self-study test prep books are decidedly inferior in quality; very few include reliable, comprehensive advice and realistic, truly useful practice tests. The majority are a waste of time, at best, and should be avoided. 

For my recommendations as to the best current self-study materials for the ACT, SAT/PSAT, and SSAT, click here, here, and here.

By far the best way to prepare to for important standardized tests is to hire an experienced private test prep coach. For many students, private coaching offers the best value, combining superior instruction, flexible scheduling, and maximum cost-effectiveness. Top quality professional test coaches in private practice with decades of experience generally charge from $150 to $250 per hour (or more). 

However, it's possible to pay a lot more for a lot less! 

The Princeton Review, for example, charges more than $300 per hour for their best tutors (those with as few as five years tutoring experience), in large blocks of hours, and then pays these tutors a small fraction of that hourly fee. For this reason, the best test coaches do NOT work for agencies, and instead run their own private practices. So while paying absolutely top dollar, you could be getting just an average quality coach. 

Click here for information on how to find the right coach.

Below is a sample medium-term ACT/SAT prep plan (adjustments should be made for the particular needs of individual students):

• Months 1-2: Strategy coaching and instruction (weekly 90-minute sessions, with timed or untimed practice between sessions.

• Months 3-4: Two full-length, timed official practice tests each month. Each practice test should be followed by at least one 90-minute coaching session to critique and correct the student's performance. In addition, students should take another complete practice test per month one section at a time (timed or untimed, as needed).

• Month 5-6: One complete, timed, official practice test per week, taken full-length or in sections (as needed), each followed by a 90-minute coaching session to critique and correct the student's performance, scheduled to conclude just before test day.

Click here for recommended test prep schedules (ACT, SAT, PSAT, SSAT, ISEE, HSPT).

Planning and preparation are the keys to unlocking a winning score on high-stakes standardized tests. The probability of success correlates most directly to the type and quality of instruction and the amount of test taking practice and performance critiquing students complete before test day. While it's certainly possible to dramatically improve one's score in a short period of time, a long-term plan allows average students sufficient time to do required practice, discover and fix patterns of error and flaws in their approach, and gain the confidence, competence, and experience necessary to perform optimally on test day. Stronger students general require less prep time.

A long term prep plan offers the vast majority of students the best chance of a successful outcome. Although it's unlikely that most students will be able to complete enough practice testing and critiquing in just a few months or weeks to maximize their final scores, even a little high quality test prep and a few well-critiqued, full-length official practice tests can make a significant difference.

Get a coach or take a course, read some books, plan your work, and work your plan.

The worst plan for test prep – by far – is no plan!

(Click here to go to Part 1.)

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.

Friday, July 01, 2011

SAT Prep Planning (Part 1)

What is the ideal length of time to devote to systematic ACT/SAT study and preparation in advance of test day? What's the best way to plan a given student's ACT/SAT prep?

Although the answers will vary considerably depending on the particular student and family in question, most students should plan to spend at least one year thoughtfully and diligently preparing to take the ACT/SAT.

Whether one's plan involves hiring an coach, taking a course, or utilizing commercial prep books, three essential ingredients combine to enable successful performance on standardized tests like the ACT/SAT: subject knowledge, strategy knowledge, and test taking practice. Each one of these factors plays a crucial role in maximizing a given student's score, the ultimate goal of any prep plan. Without sufficient development in all elements of this triad, maximum performance is unlikely to be achieved.

To do very well on the ACT/SAT, it's (of course) essential to be academically strong and know as much as possible about the particular content tested on each of these important assessments! Superior subject knowledge and basic skills, however, require years of disciplined effort and excellent classroom instruction to obtain; they simply cannot be acquired or noticeably improved any other way, certainly not in the short run. The only way to strengthen this element of the triad is to take challenging classes and work hard in school over the long term.

Knowledge of effective test taking strategy, on the other hand, can have a dramatic positive effect on students' test scores and be very quickly learned and trained (in hours, rather than years). Many unfortunate students receive artificially low scores on the SAT that give an unfairly negative impression of their academic abilities – not because they aren't capable students, but simply because they don't know how to correctly approach and take standardized tests! Without realizing it, these students make fundamental strategic errors that have a disastrous effect on their scores. Fortunately, it is possible in a short period of time to “learn the ropes” of standardized test taking, for students to adopt simple, powerfully effective test taking strategies and learn simple skills that allow them to maximize their performance on test like the ACT/SAT. This “strategic approach” enables students to make the most of the knowledge and skills they already have, and can mean the difference between disappointing scores and real success. Utilizing the "strategic approach" is the only feasible way for most students to quickly impact ACT/SAT scores in a meaningful way, and hiring an experienced academic coach who specializes in teaching the strategic approach to ACT/SAT prep is the best way to ensure the success of any test prep plan.

The third key element in the triad is perhaps most important. One would never take piano lessons without practicing at home and expect to become a much better piano player. Likewise, students with advanced subject knowledge and strategic skill who nevertheless fail to practice run a high risk of falling short of their maximum potential score. Practice is the most critical factor in predicting large score improvements on tests like the ACT/SAT. There's just no way around it – substantial score improvement requires lots of practice! The long-term plans I recommend allow students sufficient time to be thoroughly trained in test taking strategy, take plenty of timed and untimed practice tests, and fully critique their practice work – and thereby maximize the odds of obtaining optimal test scores.

Just as an athlete always warms up before a sporting contest to ensure his body is primed and ready to function at maximum strength and efficiency, it is critical for academic competitors to "warm up" before any important testing experience. No serious musician would consider hitting the stage without first warming up her fingers and reviewing the music to be performed; so too must the ACT/SAT student awaken and warm up her test-taking "muscles" before each test rehearsal or performance to guarantee the best possible results. For at least 10-20 minutes immediately before dong any SAT practice test (30 minutes before any actual SAT test), students should diligently review all notes and earlier practice work, and intently visualize themselves putting to work all they've learned in the upcoming test they're about to take.

Taking practice tests at regular intervals (say, once each month) over a long period of time (at least several months), mastering and implementing the strategic approach, and carefully scoring, critiquing, tracking, and reviewing practice work is the best way to optimize scores on the standardized tests. Though it's possible to implement a successful plan that comprises only three or four weeks'' preparation, such a tight time frame makes it that much harder for most students to fit critically important practice testing into their already full schedules. Generally, it just doesn't happen – and without sufficient practice, students lack the experience needed to ensure the best possible result, and normally fall short of their goals.

Still, some preparation is much better than none! Some students will see remarkable improvement in test scores in just a few weeks by combining quality test coaching (emphasizing the strategic approach) with as much practice as time allows. While not as effective as the long-term approach I advocate, medium or short-term prep heavily focused on the most important test taking strategies, some carefully critiqued practice testing, and disciplined review can nonetheless lead to very pleasing results.

(Click here to go to Part 2.)

-----


Copyright © 2006-present: Christopher R. Borland. All rights reserved.